analytics platform for medical practices

🕐 Read Time: 16 min          

Claims Not Getting Paid? What to Do When Your EHR Billing Service Stops Chasing

You submitted the claim. The billing service sent two emails. Then silence. No appeal. No resubmission. No follow up call. Just a denial sitting in the system aging past its timely filing window while your accounts receivable grows and your cash flow shrinks. If claims are not getting paid and nobody seems to be chasing them, you are not dealing with a billing inconvenience. You are dealing with a structural failure in your revenue cycle, and it is costing your practice real money every single week. 

The denial problem in American healthcare is not a small one. Up to 50 percent of denied claims are never resubmitted, according to MGMA. Sixty five percent of denied claims are never reworked at all. That is not a statistic about bad luck. That is a statistic about billing services and EHR platforms that were not built to pursue what they drop. At Edvak, we treat claims follow up as a core product responsibility, not an optional service tier. 

Why are so many claims not getting paid?

Denials happen for predictable reasons, and most of them are preventable before the claim ever leaves the practice. 

  • Eligibility errors. The patient’s insurance changed. The plan lapsed. The group number is wrong. A claim submitted to the wrong payer is a denial waiting to happen, and it is avoidable with a real time eligibility check before the visit. 
  • Coding errors. An incorrect ICD-10 or CPT code, a missing modifier, a bundling conflict. Coding mistakes are the leading cause of denials that could have been caught before submission. 
  • Missing or insufficient documentation. The payer looks at the note and decides the documented visit does not support the billed code. This is where documentation quality and billing accuracy become the same problem. 
  • Timely filing failures. Every payer has a window. Some are 90 days. Some are 12 months. When a denial sits unworked in a queue, it ages. Once it crosses the timely filing deadline, the money is gone permanently. 
  • Prior authorization gaps. The procedure needed approval and did not get it, or the approval was not attached to the claim at submission. 

Each of these has a specific fix. The problem is not that the fixes are complicated. The problem is that most billing services stop after the first denial notice and wait for someone to tell them what to do next.

What does "stopping after 2 emails" actually cost you?

More than most practice owners realize until they run the numbers. 

The average denial rate across medical practices sits between 5 and 10 percent of submitted claims, according to MGMA. For a practice billing 100,000 dollars a month, that is 5,000 to 10,000 dollars in denied claims every 30 days. If 50 percent of those are never resubmitted, the practice is writing off 2,500 to 5,000 dollars monthly, or 30,000 to 60,000 dollars a year, in collectible revenue that simply goes unpursued. 

The Premier survey of hospitals and health systems puts the industry wide cost of denial adjudication at 19.7 billion dollars annually. More than half of that, 10.6 billion dollars, was spent arguing over claims that should have been paid at the time of initial submission. That is not a payer problem. That is a documentation and coding problem that the right EHR fixes before the claim goes out. 

The Experian Health State of Claims report found that 41 percent of healthcare organizations say at least one in ten of their claims is denied. For practices with a Net Collection Ratio below 92 percent, annual revenue losses run between 150,000 and 700,000 dollars. 

These are not numbers from a bad month. They are the baseline for practices that do not have an automated, persistent claims follow up system working on their behalf.

What should your EHR billing service actually be doing?

A billing service that sends two emails and stops is not a billing service. It is a claim submission service. Those are different things, and the difference is where most practice revenue goes missing. 

Here is what active, integrated claims management looks like. 

Catching denials before they happen

The most powerful claims follow up is the kind that never needs to happen because the claim was clean at submission. That requires two things working before the patient leaves the building. 

Real-Time Insurance Eligibility Checks verify coverage, confirm group numbers, and flag plan changes before the visit is documented. A claim submitted to the right payer with accurate eligibility data eliminates the single largest category of preventable denials. 

Auto Capture of ICD and CPT Codes pulls diagnosis and procedure codes directly from the documented encounter rather than relying on manual code entry after the fact. When the note drives the codes, coding errors drop significantly and the claim reflects what actually happened in the visit. 

Tracking every claim from submission to payment

Once a claim goes out, it needs to be tracked, not forgotten. Claims Management gives practices visibility into every claim at every stage, pending, denied, appealed, paid, so nothing ages silently past its filing window. The difference between a practice that recovers denied claims and one that does not is almost always whether someone is watching the aging report or whether it is sitting in a dashboard nobody checks. 

Processing payments without manual bottlenecks

Approved claims that sit unposted are another form of revenue leakage. Payment Processing closes the loop from approval to posted payment without requiring staff to manually reconcile remittances line by line. 

Connecting billing to the rest of the workflow

Billing does not live in isolation. A claim that gets denied because the documentation does not support the code is a documentation problem, not a billing problem. When the Electronic Health RecordAI-Powered Documentation, and Billing and Revenue Cycle Management sit in the same integrated platform, the note, the code, and the claim are aligned from the moment the visit ends. Denials that come from documentation gaps are caught before submission, not discovered three weeks later when the remittance comes back. 

What are your options if your current billing service has stopped chasing?

If you are in the middle of this problem right now, here are the options in order of what to do first. 

Option 1: Pull your aging report today

Before you do anything else, look at your accounts receivable aging. Sort by claims over 30, 60, and 90 days. Any claim over 90 days that has not been appealed or resubmitted is at risk of passing its timely filing window. Those need to be worked immediately, not next week. 

Option 2: Ask your billing service for a denial report

A billing service that cannot produce a clear denial report by payer, by denial reason, and by follow up status is not managing your claims. It is processing them. That distinction matters and it tells you everything about what you are actually paying for. 

Option 3: Identify what is preventable versus what needs appeal

Not all denials are created equal. Eligibility denials and coding denials are largely preventable with better front end tools. Authorization denials and medical necessity denials require appeal and documentation support. Separating these two categories tells you whether your problem is upstream (submission quality) or downstream (follow up failure). 

Option 4: Evaluate whether your EHR and billing are integrated or just adjacent

Most practices that experience chronic claim follow up failure are running their EHR and billing through separate systems that share data imperfectly. When the clinical note lives in one system and the claim lives in another, the connection between documentation quality and claim outcomes is invisible. An integrated platform like Edvak’s Advanced EHR with built in Practice Management and Revenue Cycle Management closes that gap by design rather than by workaround. 

Option 5: Demand transparency through analytics

You cannot fix what you cannot see. Analytics and Reporting should show you denial rates by payer, denial reasons by category, resubmission rates, and collection ratios over time. If your current system cannot produce these reports on demand, you are flying blind on one of the most important financial metrics in your practice. 

What questions should you ask before switching billing services or EHRs?

If this problem has pushed you to the point of evaluating alternatives, these are the questions worth asking on every demo. 

  • What is the average first pass claim acceptance rate for your current clients? 
  • How does your system track denials from the moment they come back to the moment they are resolved? 
  • At what point does a denied claim get automatically flagged for follow up, and who does that follow up? 
  • What happens to a claim that is approaching its timely filing deadline? 
  • Can I see a denial trend report by payer and by denial reason for a sample practice? 
  • Is eligibility verification real time, or is it a batch check run the night before? 
  • Are ICD and CPT codes captured from the clinical note, or entered manually after documentation? 

If the vendor hesitates on any of these, the follow up infrastructure you need is probably not there. 

It is not your billing team, it is the system they are working in

Most billing staff are working as hard as the tools they have will allow. A billing coordinator manually tracking 200 open claims in a spreadsheet will miss things. A system that automatically flags aging claims, routes denials to the right work queue, and connects documentation quality to claim outcomes does not miss things. 

The practices losing 30,000 to 60,000 dollars a year to uncollected denied claims are not staffed by careless people. They are running billing through systems that were not built to chase. If claims are not getting paid and nobody is following up, the answer is not to hire more billers. The answer is to give the billers you have a system that does not let claims disappear. That is what Edvak is built to do.  

Stop leaving collected revenue on the table 

See how Claims ManagementReal-Time Insurance Eligibility Checks, and Auto Capture of ICD and CPT Codes work together to keep claims moving from submission to payment. Visit www.edvak.com to schedule a walkthrough. Book a demo now.  

Ready to take the next step?

Get a personalized demo and see how Edvak can drive real impact to your practice. 

Related Blogs

More Categories

Request a Demo

All-in-One EHR Software, for Your Practice’s Needs!